User talk:AydınSarıkaya: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== | == [[User:AydınSarıkaya|AydınSarıkaya]] 22:21, 10 June 2012 (CEST) == | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
That is also the sceene for the nearfuture of a baby who will have to run with/against them, not only on world but on outer-space,too. | That is also the sceene for the nearfuture of a baby who will have to run with/against them, not only on world but on outer-space,too. | ||
==== Do we need a scenario or a studio? ==== | |||
<small>So stu.pid question for stu.dent learning teaching.</small>needs more. | |||
Revision as of 00:14, 24 June 2012
AydınSarıkaya 22:21, 10 June 2012 (CEST)
Can project be a unique method which lost its hegemony on "generalisation" that is a slave of ip protocol which has its own ascii-generals against organic-hacks?
As a spectrality from a bit to tetra, each project seems a production of new way that can be a new method if should call it, but instead of using grandparents names, new nouns should be pronounced.
This can be a clear sense for clarifying some darkclouds on the identifying old methodic categories and discourses for some new technologies, not iron or steel but iron and still that can speak and dance by codes.
That is also the sceene for the nearfuture of a baby who will have to run with/against them, not only on world but on outer-space,too.
Do we need a scenario or a studio?
So stu.pid question for stu.dent learning teaching.needs more.