Citizen science: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (using an external editor) |
m (using an external editor) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
== Evaluation of citizen science projects == | == Evaluation of citizen science projects == | ||
=== Evaluation of informal science education === | |||
Dierking (2008:19), a contributor to the US ''Framework for Evaluating Impacts of Informal Science Education Projects'' suggests that a project should be able to answer at least the following questions at the outset of initiating a project: | Dierking (2008:19), a contributor to the US ''Framework for Evaluating Impacts of Informal Science Education Projects'' suggests that a project should be able to answer at least the following questions at the outset of initiating a project: | ||
| Line 130: | Line 132: | ||
* Cooper, Seth, Firas Khatib, Adrien Treuille, Janos Barbero, Jeehyung Lee, Michael Beenen, Andrew Leaver-Fay, David Baker, Zoran Popović and Foldit players. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online games. ''Nature'' 466, 756-760 (2010). | * Cooper, Seth, Firas Khatib, Adrien Treuille, Janos Barbero, Jeehyung Lee, Michael Beenen, Andrew Leaver-Fay, David Baker, Zoran Popović and Foldit players. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online games. ''Nature'' 466, 756-760 (2010). | ||
* Firehock, K. and West, J. (2001). A brief history of volunteer biological water monitoring using macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 14 (2) p. 197-202. | * Firehock, K. and West, J. (2001). A brief history of volunteer biological water monitoring using macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 14 (2) p. 197-202. | ||
* | * Khatib, Firas; Seth Cooper, Michael D. Tyka, Kefan Xu, Ilya Makedon, Zoran Popović, David Baker, and Foldit Players. Algorithm discovery by protein folding game players. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2011). | ||
* McCaffrey, R.E. (2005). Using Citizen Science in Urban Bird Studies. Urban Habitats. 3 (1). p. 70-86. | * McCaffrey, R.E. (2005). Using Citizen Science in Urban Bird Studies. Urban Habitats. 3 (1). p. 70-86. | ||
* Osborn, D., Pearse, J. and Roe, A. Monitoring Rocky Intertidal Shorelines: A Role for the Public in Resource Management. In California and the World Ocean: Revisiting and Revising California's Ocean Agenda. Magoon, O., Converse, H., Baird, B., Jines, B, and Miller-Henson, M., Eds. p. 624-636. Reston, VA: ASCE. | * Osborn, D., Pearse, J. and Roe, A. Monitoring Rocky Intertidal Shorelines: A Role for the Public in Resource Management. In California and the World Ocean: Revisiting and Revising California's Ocean Agenda. Magoon, O., Converse, H., Baird, B., Jines, B, and Miller-Henson, M., Eds. p. 624-636. Reston, VA: ASCE. | ||
Revision as of 14:46, 3 January 2012
Links and bibliography below was directly taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen_science
I will start working on this piece on January 2012 and try to do some quick literature review, in particular with respect to topics like "how do participants learn", "in what respect are citizens creative", "what is their motivation", "how to communities work"
- Daniel K. Schneider 16:43, 23 December 2011 (CET)
Introduction
Citizen science does not have a uniquely accepted definition. It could mean:
- Participation of citizen for collection of data, for example observation of animals, pollution, or plant growth.
- Participation of citizen for analyzing data, in various forms. For example, some provide computing power (a typical example is the captcha mechanism in this wiki for curbing spam). Another would be helping to recognize patterns (e.g. forms of galaxies)
- Dissemination of scientific thought and result in schools in order to promote engagement with science or with the intent to help updating the curriculum.
- Amateur science, i.e. citizen create scientific thoughts and other products.
- Citizen assessment of science and scientific projects.
The variety of citizen science programs is imporant with respect to many criteria, e.g.: aims, target population, locations (schools, museums, media, Internet groups), forms, subject areas, etc.
Citizens as participants
(to do)
Informal science education
Informal science education refers mostly to larger or smaller top-down initiatives that aim to raise interest for STEM (Science, technology, engineering and mathematics) subjects. As an example, “The Informal Science Education (ISE) program at the National Science Foundation (NSF) invests in projects designed to increase interest in, engagement with, and understanding of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) by individuals of all ages and backgrounds through self-directed learning experiences” (Ucko, 2008: 9)
Evaluation of citizen science projects
Evaluation of informal science education
Dierking (2008:19), a contributor to the US Framework for Evaluating Impacts of Informal Science Education Projects suggests that a project should be able to answer at least the following questions at the outset of initiating a project:
- What audience impacts will this project facilitate?
- What approach/type of project will best enable us to accomplish these goals and why do
we feel that this is the best approach to take?
- How will we know whether the activities of the project accomplished these intended
goals and objectives and with what evidence will we support the assertion that they did?
- How will we ensure that unanticipated outcomes are also documented?
This US "Informal education and outreach framework" (Uko 2008:11, Dierking 2008:21) identifies six impact categories with respect to both public audiences and professional audiences.
| Impact Category | Public Audiences | Professional Audiences | Generic Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness, knowledge or understanding (of) | STEM concepts, processes, or careers | Informal STEM education/outreach research or practice. | Measurable demonstration of assessment of, change in, or exercise of awareness, knowledge, understanding of a particular scientific topic, concept, phenomena, theory, or careers central to the project. |
| Engagement or interest (in) | STEM concepts, processes, or careers | Advancing informal STEM education/outreach field | Measurable demonstration of assessment of, change in, or exercise of engagement/interest in a particular scientific topic, concept, phenomena, theory, or careers central to the project. |
| Attitude (towards) | STEM-related topic or capabilities | Informal STEM education/outreach research or practice | Measurable demonstration of assessment of, change in, or exercise of attitude toward a particular scientific topic, concept, phenomena, theory, or careers central to the project or one’s capabilities relative to these areas. Although similar to awareness/interest/engagement, attitudes refer to changes in relatively stable, more intractable constructs such as empathy for animals and their habitats, appreciation for the role of scientists in society or attitudes toward stem cell research. |
| Behavior (related to) | STEM concepts, processes, or careers | Informal STEM education/outreach research or practice | Measurable demonstration of assessment of, change in, or exercise of behavior related to a STEM topic. These types of impacts are particularly relevant to projects that are environmental in nature or have some kind of a health science focus since action is a desired outcome. |
| Skills (based on) | STEM concepts, processes, or careers | Informal STEM education/outreach research or practice | Measurable demonstration of the development and/or reinforcement of skills, either entirely new ones or the reinforcement, even practice, of developing skills. These tend to be procedural aspects of knowing, as opposed to the more declarative aspects of knowledge impacts. Although they can sometimes manifest as engagement, typically observed skills include a level of depth and skill such as engaging in scientific inquiry skills (observing, classifying, exploring, questioning, predicting, or experimenting), as well as developing/practicing very specific skills related to the use of scientific instruments and devices (e.g. using microscopes or telescopes successfully). |
| Other | Project specific | Project specific | Project specific |
From this table, Dierking (2008:23) then derives a simple worksheet for Developing Intended Impacts, Indicators & Evidence
| ISE Category of Impact | Potential indicators | Evidence that impact was attained |
|---|---|---|
| Awareness, knowledge or understanding of STEM concepts, processes or careers | ||
| Engagement or interest in STEM concepts, processes, or careers | ||
| Attitude towards STEM-related topics or capabilities | ||
| Behavior resulting from experience | ||
| Skills based on experience | ||
| Other (describe) |
Links
General
Organizations
- Citizen Science Alliance
- OpenScientist.org
- The Society of Amateur Scientists
- Citizen CyberScience Centre
- Expert and Citizen Assessment of Science and Technology
- Research2Practice, US web site for informal STEM education.
- InformalScience.org. A resource and online community for informal learning projects, research and evaluation. (USA)
Index pages
- scistarter (Science we ca do together)
On-line environments
- foldit is described as “a revolutionary new computer game enabling you to contribute to important scientific research.” I'd rather qualify it as en engaging cognitive tool.
- World Water Monitoring Day
- Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology projects
- Galaxy Zoo (Wikipedia)
- ParkScan
- Stardust@home (Wikipedia)
- Clickworkers (Wikipedia)
- Christmas Bird Count (Wikipedia)
- Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology projects (Wikipedia)
- CoCoRaHS (Wikipedia)
- Field Expedition: Mongolia
- ZooinVerse
Evaluation
- Informalscience.org/ is a resource and online community for informal learning projects, research and evaluation. It includes evaluations of several informal science learning projects
- Friedman, A. (Ed.). (March 12, 2008). Framework for Evaluating Impacts of Informal Science Education Projects [On-line]. http://informalscience.org/evaluations/eval_framework.pdf. Originally at: http://insci.org/resources/Eval_Framework.pdf (broken link)
- The 2002 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation, NSF (USA) by Joy Frechtling Westat
Bibliography
- Ballard, H., Pilz, D., Jones, E.T., and Getz, C. (2005). Training Curriculum for Scientists and Managers: Broadening Participation in Biological Monitoring. Corvalis, OR: Institute for Culture and Ecology.
- Baretto, C., Fastovsky, D. and Sheehan, P. (2003). A Model for Integrating the Public into Scientific Research. Journal of Geoscience Education. 50 (1). p. 71-75.
- Bauer, M., Petkova, K., and Boyadjieva, P. (2000). Public Knowledge of and Attitudes to Science: Alternative Measures That May End the "Science War". Science Technology and Human Values. 25 (1). p. 30-51.
- Bonney, R. and LaBranche, M. (2004). Citizen Science: Involving the Public in Research. ASTC Dimensions. May/June 2004, p. 13.
- Bonney, R., Cooper, C.B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K.V. and Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy. BioScience. 59 (11). P. 977-984.
- Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., and Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific Knowledge and Attitude Change: The Impact of a Citizen Science Project. International Journal of Science Education. 27 (9). p. 1099-1121.
- Cooper, C.B., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T., and Bonney, R. (2007). Citizen Science as a Tool for Conservation in Residential Ecosystems. Ecology and Society. 12 (2).
- Cooper, Seth, Firas Khatib, Adrien Treuille, Janos Barbero, Jeehyung Lee, Michael Beenen, Andrew Leaver-Fay, David Baker, Zoran Popović and Foldit players. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online games. Nature 466, 756-760 (2010).
- Firehock, K. and West, J. (2001). A brief history of volunteer biological water monitoring using macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 14 (2) p. 197-202.
- Khatib, Firas; Seth Cooper, Michael D. Tyka, Kefan Xu, Ilya Makedon, Zoran Popović, David Baker, and Foldit Players. Algorithm discovery by protein folding game players. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2011).
- McCaffrey, R.E. (2005). Using Citizen Science in Urban Bird Studies. Urban Habitats. 3 (1). p. 70-86.
- Osborn, D., Pearse, J. and Roe, A. Monitoring Rocky Intertidal Shorelines: A Role for the Public in Resource Management. In California and the World Ocean: Revisiting and Revising California's Ocean Agenda. Magoon, O., Converse, H., Baird, B., Jines, B, and Miller-Henson, M., Eds. p. 624-636. Reston, VA: ASCE.
- Silvertown, J. (2009). A New Dawn for Citizen Science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 24 (9). p. 467-471
- Spiro, M. (2004). What should the citizen know about science? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 97 (1).
- Hand, Eric (2010). "Citizen science: People power". Nature 466, 685-687
- Ucko, David A. (2008), Introduction To Evaluating Impacts Of Nsf Informal Science Education Projects, in Friedman, A. (Ed.). Framework for Evaluating Impacts of Informal Science Education Projects [On-line]. http://informalscience.org/evaluations/eval_framework.pdf.