Talk:Ontology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Good idea to look at this. Related stuff I started here:[[OWL]], also [[MOTPlus]] and maybe DialogPlus. Definitly OWL should be integrated. Btw you also can have a look at the Protégé ontology editor. | Good idea to look at this. Related stuff I started here:[[OWL]], also [[MOTPlus]] and maybe DialogPlus. Definitly OWL should be integrated. Btw you also can have a look at the Protégé ontology editor. | ||
Yes. I intend to integrate OWL at the very least. I feel I am in a little over my head though and trying to make sense of it all. A lot of the literature very quickly jumps into mathematical expressions of entities and their relations that are beyond me. And I also want to review some editors and find some examples of simple ontologies (or at least represented simply).[[User:Kalli|kalli]] 10:15, 25 January 2007 (MET) | |||
Revision as of 10:15, 25 January 2007
Good idea to look at this. Related stuff I started here:OWL, also MOTPlus and maybe DialogPlus. Definitly OWL should be integrated. Btw you also can have a look at the Protégé ontology editor.
Yes. I intend to integrate OWL at the very least. I feel I am in a little over my head though and trying to make sense of it all. A lot of the literature very quickly jumps into mathematical expressions of entities and their relations that are beyond me. And I also want to review some editors and find some examples of simple ontologies (or at least represented simply).kalli 10:15, 25 January 2007 (MET)