View source for Enterprise architecture framework

{{incomplete}}
<pageby nominor="false" comments="false"/>

== Introduction ==

An enterprise architecture (EA) framework is a "language" that allows to describe the architecture of organizations. 

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_architecture Wikipedia] (retrieved June 22, 2010) describes {{quotation|An enterprise architecture (EA) [as] a rigorous description of the structure of an enterprise, its decomposition into subsystems, the relationships between the subsystems, the relationships with the external environment, the terminology to use, and the guiding principles for the design and evolution of an enterprise.[1][2][3]  This description is comprehensive, including enterprise goals, business functions, business process, roles, organisational structures, business information, software applications and computer systems. [...] Enterprise architects use various business methods, analytical techniques and conceptual tools to understand and document the structure and dynamics of an enterprise. In doing so, they produce lists, drawings, documents and models, together called "artifacts". These artifacts describe the logical organization of business functions, business capabilities, business processes, people organization, information resources, business systems, software applications, computing capabilities, information exchange and communications infrastructure within the enterprise.}}

See also: 
* [[business process modeling]] and process notation/execution languages like [[BPEL]] and [[BPMN]]
* [[workflow]], [[change management]]

== Examples of EA frameworks ==

Most EA frameworks attempt to provide a language that can describe the overall organization architecture. However, many other business modeling frameworks just focus on one aspect. As an example, we included the Business Motivation Model below, for models see for example various [[:category:workflow|workflow]] languages, such as [[BPMN]] business process management notation language.

=== The Open Group Architecture Framework ===

According to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOGAF Wikipedia], The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) is based on four pillars, called [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/architecture domain]s:
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_architecture Business architecture] or business process architecture which defines the business strategy, governance, organization, and key business processes of the organization
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applications_architecture Applications architecture] which provides a blueprint for the individual application systems to be deployed, the interactions between the application systems, and their relationships to the core business processes of the organization with the frameworks for services to be exposed as business functions for integration.
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_architecture Data architecture] which describes the structure of an organization's logical and physical data assets and the associated data management resources
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_architecture Technical architecture] or ''technology architecture'' which describes the hardware, software  and network infrastructure needed to support the deployment of core, mission-critical applications. (retrieved 16:59, 23 June 2010 (UTC))

[[image:Layers_of_the_Enterprise_Architecture.jpg|thumb|600px|none|Layers of enterprise architecture. Source: Niles E Hewlett (2006) via [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Layers_of_the_Enterprise_Architecture.jpg Wikipedia] ]]

An interesting TOGAF topic concerns architecture development including [[change management]]:

[[image:TOGAF_ADM.jpg|thumb|400px|none|TOGAF Architecture Development Method. Source: S. Marley, NASA via [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TOGAF_ADM.jpg Wikipedia] ]]

=== The Zachman frameworks ===

{{quotation|The Zachman Framework is an Enterprise Architecture framework for enterprise architecture, which provides a formal and highly structured way of viewing  and defining an enterprise. It consists of a two dimensional classification matrix based on the intersection of six communication questions (What, Where, When, Why, Who and How) with six rows according to reification transformations.}} ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zachman_Framework Wikipedia], retrieved 17:08, 23 June 2010 (UTC)).

[[image:Zachman_Framework_Model.svg|thumb|800px|none| Zachman Framework circa 2009, Source: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Zachman_Framework_Model.svg Wikipedia] ]]

=== Business motivation model ===

The [http://www.omg.org/spec/BMM/ Business Motivation Model] (BMM) developed by [http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/bms_spec_catalog.htm Object Management Group] defines the what, why and how for an organization. In more operational terms it defines the ends, the means, influences (pro/against) and assessments.

[[image:OMG Business motivation model.jpg|frame|none| Source: [http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nickmalik/archive/2009/01/09/an-examination-of-the-omg-business-motivation-model.aspx Nick Malik / OMG] ]]

== In education ==

Although EA architecture frameworks focus on organization that produce goods and services as apposed to knowledge and education, such "languages" that allow to describe aims, structures, functions and processes could be used for several purposes:

* To make explicit "properties" of larger institutions like universities, e.g. in a [[change management]] perspective

* To help (re-)engineering structure and processes of smaller research and teaching units.

* To plan for new programs like a [[distance teaching]] degree or to organize large research projects.

We hypothesize that the major challenge would be to use these tools for "common grounding", i.e. enhance communication between participants. In other words, in education, such frameworks could make the many implicits explicit and therefore allow for focused discussion as required by participative change management models like [[expansive learning]]. We speculate that EA architecture frameworks rather will be used to increase bureaucratic [[workflow]]s as opposed to create simpler and better ones and to impose planned procedures where none are needed, i.e. dynamic planning is more appropriate. This is typically the case of EU research projects [http://www.trust-researchers.eu/ which tend to stifle innovation].

== Links ==

; Some Wikipedia links
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_architecture Enterprise architecture]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_architecture_framework enterprise architecture framework]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_modeling Enterprise modeling], the abstract representation, description and definition of the structure, processes, information and resources of an identifiable business, government  body, or other large organization.
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_process Business processes]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_process_modeling Business process modeling], the activity of representing processes of an enterprise, so that the current process may be analyzed and improved. See also [[BPMN]].
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_architecture Business architecture]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_architecture Process architecture]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_Model Operating Model]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architecture_domain architecture domains]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOGAF TOGAF]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Source_Enterprise_Architecture_Tools Open Source Enterprise Architecture Tools]

; Introductions
* Niles E Hewlett (2006), The USDA Enterprise Architecture Program. PMP CEA, Enterprise Architecture Team, USDA-OCIO. January 25, 2006. [http://www.ocio.usda.gov/p_mgnt/doc/PM_Class_EA_NEH_012506_Final.ppt PPT]
* [http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nickmalik/archive/2009/01/09/an-examination-of-the-omg-business-motivation-model.aspx An examination of the OMG Business Motivation Model] by Nick Malik, Jan 2009.

[[Category: workflow]]
[[Category: Organization and management]]
[[Category: Affect and motivation]]