Scaffolded knowledge integration: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
{{quotation | In the SKI framework, learners are viewed as adding to their repertoire of ideas and reorganising their knowledgeweb about science. Students sort out their ideas as a result of instruction, experience, observation, and reflection (Linn & Hsi, 2000). The framework is organised around four principles to promote knowledge integration: (a) making science accessible for students, (b) making thinking visible for students, (c) providing social supports for students, and (d) promoting lifelong science learning.}} (Williams & Linn, 2002: 416).
{{quotation | In the SKI framework, learners are viewed as adding to their repertoire of ideas and reorganising their knowledgeweb about science. Students sort out their ideas as a result of instruction, experience, observation, and reflection (Linn & Hsi, 2000). The framework is organised around four principles to promote knowledge integration: (a) making science accessible for students, (b) making thinking visible for students, (c) providing social supports for students, and (d) promoting lifelong science learning.}} (Williams & Linn, 2002: 416).


See also: [[socio-constructivism]], [[inquiry-based learning]], [[Project-based science model]], ...
See also: [[socio-constructivism]], [[inquiry-based learning]], [[Project-based science model]], [[project-oriented learning]], ...


== The model ==
== The model ==
Line 10: Line 10:
(1) Instruction should connect science to personally relevant problems and prior knowledge, i.e. to make a link between instructed and spontaneous concepts.
(1) Instruction should connect science to personally relevant problems and prior knowledge, i.e. to make a link between instructed and spontaneous concepts.


(2) Students and teachers are encouraged to {{make their thinking visible, describing how they recognise new ideas, and reorganise and connect new and prior ideas. Students explore events and phenomena first hand and develop from those observations important concepts and ideas. Technological supports such as visualisations, films, models, and simulations can also make thinking visible.We ask students to make predictions, drawinferences, and construct generalisations}} ((Williams & Linn, 2002: 417)
(2) Students and teachers are encouraged to {{quotation | make their thinking visible, describing how they recognise new ideas, and reorganise and connect new and prior ideas. Students explore events and phenomena first hand and develop from those observations important concepts and ideas. Technological supports such as visualisations, films, models, and simulations can also make thinking visible.We ask students to make predictions, drawinferences, and construct generalisations}} ((Williams & Linn, 2002: 417)


(3) Based on Vygotsky's concept zone of proximal development - a foundation of most [[socio-constructivism | socio-constructivist]] designs, the SKI {{.. emphasises that providing students with social supports in a science classroom can promote knowledge integration. Collaborative learning situations such as discussions and debates can be designed so students offer explanations, interpretations, and resolutions supported by a peer or a scientist.}} (Williams & Linn, 2002: 418)
(3) Based on Vygotsky's concept zone of proximal development - a foundation of most [[socio-constructivism | socio-constructivist]] designs, the SKI {{quotation | [...] emphasises that providing students with social supports in a science classroom can promote knowledge integration. Collaborative learning situations such as discussions and debates can be designed so students offer explanations, interpretations, and resolutions supported by a peer or a scientist.}} (Williams & Linn, 2002: 418)


(4) Promote autonomy for lifelong science learning: {{quotation | To prepare students to integrate the ideas they learn in science and revisit them once they have completed a science course, [[WISE]] software supports questioning, analysing, and reflecting. [...] Students are asked to identify weaknesses in arguments and question the validity of the scientific information presented. These activities allow students to link their real world experiences with scientific concepts taught in school and prompt students to make the links between spontaneous and instructed ideas. [...] In addition, the WISE software features "Amanda the Panda", an electronic guidance tool that supplies students with hints regarding salient aspects of Internet evidence and also reminds students of the purpose of a project activity. These forms of guidance make the computer a learning partner in the classroom, encouraging students to link their real world experiences with scientific concepts.}} (Williams & Linn, 2002: 418)
(4) Promote autonomy for lifelong science learning: {{quotation | To prepare students to integrate the ideas they learn in science and revisit them once they have completed a science course, [[WISE]] software supports questioning, analysing, and reflecting. [...] Students are asked to identify weaknesses in arguments and question the validity of the scientific information presented. These activities allow students to link their real world experiences with scientific concepts taught in school and prompt students to make the links between spontaneous and instructed ideas. [...] In addition, the WISE software features "Amanda the Panda", an electronic guidance tool that supplies students with hints regarding salient aspects of Internet evidence and also reminds students of the purpose of a project activity. These forms of guidance make the computer a learning partner in the classroom, encouraging students to link their real world experiences with scientific concepts.}} (Williams & Linn, 2002: 418)
Line 24: Line 24:
* Linn, M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(2), 103-126. [http://www.springerlink.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.1007/BF02214052 Abstract/PDF] {{ar}}
* Linn, M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(2), 103-126. [http://www.springerlink.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.1007/BF02214052 Abstract/PDF] {{ar}}


* Williams, M. & Linn, M. C.(2002) WISE Inquiry in Fifth Grade Biology.Research in Science Education, 32 (4), 415-436. [http://www.springerlink.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.1023/A:1022452719316 Abstract/HTML/PDF] {{ar}}.
* Williams, M. & Linn, M. C.(2002) WISE Inquiry in Fifth Grade Biology.Research in Science Education, 32 (4), 415-436. [http://www.springerlink.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.1023/A:1022452719316 Abstract/PDF] {{ar}}.




[[Category: Instructional design models]]
[[Category: Instructional design models]]

Revision as of 15:12, 19 July 2006

Definition

“In the SKI framework, learners are viewed as adding to their repertoire of ideas and reorganising their knowledgeweb about science. Students sort out their ideas as a result of instruction, experience, observation, and reflection (Linn & Hsi, 2000). The framework is organised around four principles to promote knowledge integration: (a) making science accessible for students, (b) making thinking visible for students, (c) providing social supports for students, and (d) promoting lifelong science learning.” (Williams & Linn, 2002: 416).

See also: socio-constructivism, inquiry-based learning, Project-based science model, project-oriented learning, ...

The model

(1) Instruction should connect science to personally relevant problems and prior knowledge, i.e. to make a link between instructed and spontaneous concepts.

(2) Students and teachers are encouraged to “make their thinking visible, describing how they recognise new ideas, and reorganise and connect new and prior ideas. Students explore events and phenomena first hand and develop from those observations important concepts and ideas. Technological supports such as visualisations, films, models, and simulations can also make thinking visible.We ask students to make predictions, drawinferences, and construct generalisations” ((Williams & Linn, 2002: 417)

(3) Based on Vygotsky's concept zone of proximal development - a foundation of most socio-constructivist designs, the SKI “[...] emphasises that providing students with social supports in a science classroom can promote knowledge integration. Collaborative learning situations such as discussions and debates can be designed so students offer explanations, interpretations, and resolutions supported by a peer or a scientist.” (Williams & Linn, 2002: 418)

(4) Promote autonomy for lifelong science learning: “To prepare students to integrate the ideas they learn in science and revisit them once they have completed a science course, WISE software supports questioning, analysing, and reflecting. [...] Students are asked to identify weaknesses in arguments and question the validity of the scientific information presented. These activities allow students to link their real world experiences with scientific concepts taught in school and prompt students to make the links between spontaneous and instructed ideas. [...] In addition, the WISE software features "Amanda the Panda", an electronic guidance tool that supplies students with hints regarding salient aspects of Internet evidence and also reminds students of the purpose of a project activity. These forms of guidance make the computer a learning partner in the classroom, encouraging students to link their real world experiences with scientific concepts.” (Williams & Linn, 2002: 418)

Examples

  • See the article about the WISE project

References

  • Linn, M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(2), 103-126. Abstract/PDF (Access restricted)
  • Williams, M. & Linn, M. C.(2002) WISE Inquiry in Fifth Grade Biology.Research in Science Education, 32 (4), 415-436. Abstract/PDF (Access restricted).