4C-ID: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Incomplete}}
== Definition ==
== Definition ==


* 4C/ID is an [[instructional design model]] by van Merriënboer and others.
* 4C/ID is an [[instructional design model]] by van Merriënboer and others.


* "4C" means "four components", "ID" means "Instructional Design".
* "4C" means "four components", "ID" means "Instructional Design". It also can be found in Merril's [[first principles of instruction]].


* According to [http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc_data/4cid.html Martin Ryder], the The 4C-ID instructional model is characterized by four components: (1) Learning Tasks, (2) Supportive Information, (3) Procedural Information and (4) Part-Task Practice. The task are ordered by task difficulty and each task offers at the beginning a lot of scaffolding which is reduced as the learner progresses.
* According to [http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc_data/4cid.html Martin Ryder], the The 4C-ID instructional model is characterized by four components: (1) Learning Tasks, (2) Supportive Information, (3) Procedural Information and (4) Part-Task Practice. The task are ordered by task difficulty and each task offers at the beginning a lot of scaffolding which is reduced as the learner progresses.
Line 13: Line 14:
4C/ID is what I call a "main-stream" Instructional Design Model that addresses the issue of how to teach complex skills, i.e. solid know-how that can be applied to real problem problems.
4C/ID is what I call a "main-stream" Instructional Design Model that addresses the issue of how to teach complex skills, i.e. solid know-how that can be applied to real problem problems.


A quote from Merri�nboer et al. (2002):
According to Merriënboer et al. (2002):
" The 4C/ID-model [....] addresses at least three deficits in previous instructional design models. First, the 4C/ID-model focuses on the integration and coordinated performance of task-specific constituent skills rather than on knowledge types, context or presentation-delivery media. Second, the model makes a critical distinction between supportive information and required just-in-time (JIT) information (the latter specifies the performance required, not only the type of knowledge required). And third, traditional models use either part-task or whole-task practice; the 4C/IDmodel recommends a mixture where part-task practice supports very complex, "whole-task" learning. "
{{quotationbox | The 4C/ID-model [....] addresses at least three deficits in previous instructional design models. First, the 4C/ID-model focuses on the integration and coordinated performance of task-specific constituent skills rather than on knowledge types, context or presentation-delivery media. Second, the model makes a critical distinction between supportive information and required just-in-time (JIT) information (the latter specifies the performance required, not only the type of knowledge required). And third, traditional models use either part-task or whole-task practice; the 4C/IDmodel recommends a mixture where part-task practice supports very complex, "whole-task" learning.}}


Quote from Merril (2002:56)" The model is clearly problem-based. "At the heart of this training strategy is whole-task practice, in which more and more complex versions of the whole complex cognitive skill are practiced.  In ... the analysis phase ... the skill is decomposed in a hierarchy of constituent skills; ... classified as recurrent constituent skills, which require more-or-less consistent performance over problem situations, or nonrecurrent constituent skills, which require highly variable performance over situations" (p. 8). "While learners practice simple to complex versions of a whole task, instructional methods that promote just-intime information presentation are used to support the recurrent aspects of the whole task while, at the same time, instructional methods that promote elaboration are used to support the non-recurrent aspects of the task" (p. 10).
According to Merril (2002:56), the model is clearly problem-based although not in the sense of typical [[problem-based learning]] models. {{At the heart of this training strategy is whole-task practice, in which more and more complex versions of the whole complex cognitive skill are practiced.  In ... the analysis phase ... the skill is decomposed in a hierarchy of constituent skills; ... classified as recurrent constituent skills, which require more-or-less consistent performance over problem situations, or nonrecurrent constituent skills, which require highly variable performance over situations" (p. 8). "While learners practice simple to complex versions of a whole task, instructional methods that promote just-intime information presentation are used to support the recurrent aspects of the whole task while, at the same time, instructional methods that promote elaboration are used to support the non-recurrent aspects of the task" (p. 10).}}


The four components are described in detail in [http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=000000130672461&Fmt=4&clientId=42705&RQT=309&VName=PQD Merrienboer (2002)] and from which this picture is taken:
The four components are described in detail in [http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=000000130672461&Fmt=4&clientId=42705&RQT=309&VName=PQD Merrienboer (2002)] and from which this picture is taken:

Revision as of 11:11, 28 September 2006

Definition

  • According to Martin Ryder, the The 4C-ID instructional model is characterized by four components: (1) Learning Tasks, (2) Supportive Information, (3) Procedural Information and (4) Part-Task Practice. The task are ordered by task difficulty and each task offers at the beginning a lot of scaffolding which is reduced as the learner progresses.

See also: Elaboration theory (a much early model from Reigeluth).

The design

4C/ID is what I call a "main-stream" Instructional Design Model that addresses the issue of how to teach complex skills, i.e. solid know-how that can be applied to real problem problems.

According to Merriënboer et al. (2002):

The 4C/ID-model [....] addresses at least three deficits in previous instructional design models. First, the 4C/ID-model focuses on the integration and coordinated performance of task-specific constituent skills rather than on knowledge types, context or presentation-delivery media. Second, the model makes a critical distinction between supportive information and required just-in-time (JIT) information (the latter specifies the performance required, not only the type of knowledge required). And third, traditional models use either part-task or whole-task practice; the 4C/IDmodel recommends a mixture where part-task practice supports very complex, "whole-task" learning.

According to Merril (2002:56), the model is clearly problem-based although not in the sense of typical problem-based learning models. {{At the heart of this training strategy is whole-task practice, in which more and more complex versions of the whole complex cognitive skill are practiced. In ... the analysis phase ... the skill is decomposed in a hierarchy of constituent skills; ... classified as recurrent constituent skills, which require more-or-less consistent performance over problem situations, or nonrecurrent constituent skills, which require highly variable performance over situations" (p. 8). "While learners practice simple to complex versions of a whole task, instructional methods that promote just-intime information presentation are used to support the recurrent aspects of the whole task while, at the same time, instructional methods that promote elaboration are used to support the non-recurrent aspects of the task" (p. 10).}}

The four components are described in detail in Merrienboer (2002) and from which this picture is taken: 4C-ID-Model.jpg


References

Merrill, David, First Principles of Instruction, ETR&D, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2002, pp. 43-59 ISSN 1042-1629. Preprint version

van Merriënboer, J.J.G (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications

van Merriënboer, Jeroen.J.G, Richard E Clark, Marcel B M de Croock, (2002) Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model, Educational Technology, Research and Development. 50 (2);39-64 [1]