Competence map: Difference between revisions
m (using an external editor) |
m (using an external editor) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Stub}} | |||
== Definition == | == Definition == | ||
In a competence map, curriculum content is described in terms of interrelated competencies rather than in terms of fragmented or disassociated knowledge, skills and attitudes. (Stoof et al., 2007:348) | |||
== Structure of a comptence map == | |||
According to Stoof et al. (2007:348) {{quotationbox| Competence maps typically consist of three parts: | |||
* The first part contains competence descriptions, which provide detailed information about each competency that is distinguished in a certain domain or profession. A competence description may contain information about its output or results, its relationships with other competencies, the elements making up the competency, and an example of the competency in practice. [...] | |||
* The second part of a competence map consists of a competence framework or figure, which is a visual summary of the competence descriptions. A competence figure can be used as an aid to quickly communicate what a competence map is about. | |||
* The third part of a competence map contains general information about the domain, the goal, and definitions used.}} | |||
The most important element for instructional designs are the ''competence descriptions''. | |||
Stoof et al (2007:349) acknowledge that competence can be defined in manners that suit specific situations. They however point out six important dimensions found in an analysis of 16 competence maps and that designers should think about when creating competence maps: | |||
# '''levels''': can competencies can be subdivided, e.g. in starting level, advanced level, and experienced level ? | |||
# '''context'': are competencies connected to real world phenomena, e.g. example tasks, roles, functions or situations ? | |||
# '''relationships''', are competencies are related to each other ? | |||
# '''elements''', are competencies composed of several parts, e.g. knowledge, skills and attitudes ? | |||
# '''output''', can competencies lead to specific outcomes, such as a product or service, or behavior in general ? | |||
# '''kinds''', are there more competencies than just professional competencies, such as learning competencies, career competencies and competencies that are general to all kinds of professions ? | |||
See also: [[learning e-portfolio]], [[lesson planning]] | See also: [[learning e-portfolio]], [[lesson planning]] | ||
== Tools == | == Tools == | ||
Line 23: | Line 39: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
* Stoof, Angela; Rob L. Martens and Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer (2006). Effects of Web-based Support for the Construction of Competence Maps, ''Instructional Science'' 34 (3), 189-211. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-0003-1 DOI 10.1007/s11251-006-0003-1] | * Stoof, Angela; Rob L. Martens and Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer (2007). Web-based support for constructing competence maps: design and formative evaluation, ''Educational Technology Research and Development'', 55 (4). [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9014-5 Abstract/PDF] {{ar}}. | ||
* Stoof, Angela; Rob L. Martens and Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer (2006).Effects of Web-based Support for the Construction of Competence Maps, ''Instructional Science'' 34 (3), 189-211. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-0003-1 DOI 10.1007/s11251-006-0003-1] {{ar}}. | |||
* Stoof, A., Martens, R. L., & van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (2005). Web-based support for constructing competence maps: design and formative evaluation. Manuscript submitted for publication | * Stoof, A., Martens, R. L., & van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (2005). Web-based support for constructing competence maps: design and formative evaluation. Manuscript submitted for publication |
Revision as of 14:23, 24 July 2007
Definition
In a competence map, curriculum content is described in terms of interrelated competencies rather than in terms of fragmented or disassociated knowledge, skills and attitudes. (Stoof et al., 2007:348)
Structure of a comptence map
According to Stoof et al. (2007:348)
Competence maps typically consist of three parts:
- The first part contains competence descriptions, which provide detailed information about each competency that is distinguished in a certain domain or profession. A competence description may contain information about its output or results, its relationships with other competencies, the elements making up the competency, and an example of the competency in practice. [...]
- The second part of a competence map consists of a competence framework or figure, which is a visual summary of the competence descriptions. A competence figure can be used as an aid to quickly communicate what a competence map is about.
- The third part of a competence map contains general information about the domain, the goal, and definitions used.
The most important element for instructional designs are the competence descriptions.
Stoof et al (2007:349) acknowledge that competence can be defined in manners that suit specific situations. They however point out six important dimensions found in an analysis of 16 competence maps and that designers should think about when creating competence maps:
- levels: can competencies can be subdivided, e.g. in starting level, advanced level, and experienced level ?
- 'context: are competencies connected to real world phenomena, e.g. example tasks, roles, functions or situations ?
- relationships, are competencies are related to each other ?
- elements, are competencies composed of several parts, e.g. knowledge, skills and attitudes ?
- output, can competencies lead to specific outcomes, such as a product or service, or behavior in general ?
- kinds, are there more competencies than just professional competencies, such as learning competencies, career competencies and competencies that are general to all kinds of professions ?
See also: learning e-portfolio, lesson planning
Tools
COMET
Stoof et al. (2006) studied wether a combination of a construction kit, phenomenarium, and information bank could help designers, i.e. improve the process quality of making a competence map.
- The construction kit is defined by the authors “as a set of prefabricated parts that can be assembled into a variety of working models which can then be taken to pieces. (p. 190)”.
- The phenomenarium is defined as “an area for the specific purpose of presenting phenomena and making them accessible to scrutiny and manipulation. It contains extractions, simplifications, simulations, or models of the real world.” (p 191).
- The information bank is to provide “explicit information about several topics. It explains phenomena, names causes, gives background information, provides guidelines for performing particular tasks, and so forth.” (p. 191).
“In a factorial design, eight conditions with all possible combinations of construction kits (present or absent), phenomenaria (present or absent) and information banks (full or condensed) were compared. (p. 204).”. Results indicated that availability of a construction kit enhanced percieved support and control however at the cost of taking more time. The phenomeniarium both improved perceived support and control, even in the absence of the construction kit. Finally, the information bank did not have any effect on process quality.
References
- Stoof, Angela; Rob L. Martens and Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer (2007). Web-based support for constructing competence maps: design and formative evaluation, Educational Technology Research and Development, 55 (4). Abstract/PDF (Access restricted).
- Stoof, Angela; Rob L. Martens and Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer (2006).Effects of Web-based Support for the Construction of Competence Maps, Instructional Science 34 (3), 189-211. DOI 10.1007/s11251-006-0003-1 (Access restricted).
- Stoof, A., Martens, R. L., & van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (2005). Web-based support for constructing competence maps: design and formative evaluation. Manuscript submitted for publication
- Stoof, A., Martens, R.L., Merriënboer, J.J.G., Bastiaens, T.J. (2002) "The boundary approach of competence: a constructivist aid for understanding and using the concept of competence" Human Resource Development Review 1: 345-365
- Tilman, H., Stoof, A. (2002) "Communicatie als kritische succesfactor bij het ontwikkelen van competentiegerichte beroepsprofielen [Communication as critical success factor in developing competence-based professional profiles]" TH&MA 3: 53