« OHS 2019 Chap5 » : différence entre les versions

De biorousso
Aller à la navigation Aller à la recherche
Aucun résumé des modifications
Aucun résumé des modifications
Ligne 5 : Ligne 5 :
*Would you be an advocate of biologically recreating or engineering a neanderthaal in today's age?
*Would you be an advocate of biologically recreating or engineering a neanderthaal in today's age?
*If different species such as homo erectus and homo spapiens could interbreed, wouldn't that change the definition of what makes a species?
*If different species such as homo erectus and homo spapiens could interbreed, wouldn't that change the definition of what makes a species?
*On page 88, "some experts consider that true humans nevertheless go back even further than 2 million years ago." How did they come to this conclusion? How did they define a human?
*Why did scientists seperate/create different periods of "Stone Age"? What are the characteristics of each period?
*Is it possible that humans will evolve even more and reach a point that it will create a new species? What will be the consequences? Will we be considered as humans as well?
*Why did some experts consider that fossils found at Dmanisi in Georgia are part of Homo erectus and are not considered as a new species, Homo naledi? What are their similarities?
*What suggests that Homo antecessor is the last common ancestor of the subsequent Neanderthal and H. sapiens lineages?
*Why are the Neanderthals considered as ancient humans?





Version du 21 mai 2019 à 11:26

  • In chapter 5 how is the genus Homo defined physically and how is this genus different from other species?
  • Why is the main difficulty to know if similar structures are homologous or analogous ?
  • "Complex language has also been proposed as a defining feature of humans." (p.84)
  • When did we start talking and how?
  • Would you be an advocate of biologically recreating or engineering a neanderthaal in today's age?
  • If different species such as homo erectus and homo spapiens could interbreed, wouldn't that change the definition of what makes a species?
  • On page 88, "some experts consider that true humans nevertheless go back even further than 2 million years ago." How did they come to this conclusion? How did they define a human?
  • Why did scientists seperate/create different periods of "Stone Age"? What are the characteristics of each period?
  • Is it possible that humans will evolve even more and reach a point that it will create a new species? What will be the consequences? Will we be considered as humans as well?
  • Why did some experts consider that fossils found at Dmanisi in Georgia are part of Homo erectus and are not considered as a new species, Homo naledi? What are their similarities?
  • What suggests that Homo antecessor is the last common ancestor of the subsequent Neanderthal and H. sapiens lineages?
  • Why are the Neanderthals considered as ancient humans?